 |
 |
We have many arguments with supporting data that indicate we are
in a binary system, but one of the strongest is the “trend in
precession rates”.
Calculated precession rates over the last 100 years show increasing
precession rates which produce a declining precession cycle period.
There is no reason the relatively constant mass of the Sun and Moon
torquing the Earth should produce such figures. There is every reason
a binary system would – because these numbers are not caused
solely by local mass torquing – they are annual rates of our
Sun’s path around it’s binary in a elliptical orbit. They
will increase and decrease as the Sun speeds up and slows down as
required by elliptical orbits (according to Kepler’s laws).
In the lunisolar model, if this trend were extended in either direction
by a few million years one could say precession was once non-existent
– and in the future, the earth will wobble so fast that we will
all eventually fall off. We only know the historical geological record,
which indicates a cyclical pattern – like an orbit.
What is more logical: Is the mass of the Sun and Moon changing this
rapidly? Or is the Earth changing orientation to inertial space reflective
of a common elliptical pattern?
Constant
of General Precession – Table
| Year/Epoch
|
Value ("/year) |
Source |
Period of Revolution |
| 150 A.D. |
46” |
Ptolemy/Hipparchos
(questionable accuracy) |
28000 |
| 1900 |
50.2638 |
Walter Fricke Abstract
(Struve – Peters for 1900) |
25784.0 |
1900
|
50.2564 |
1900 Astronomical Almanac
(Simon Newcomb’s value) |
25787.8 |
| 1901 – 1975 |
50.2564 + (year – 1900)*0.000222 |
Astronomical Almanac for that year |
25779.2 |
| 1994 |
50.2877 |
J. G. Williams |
25771.7 |
| 2000 |
50.290966 |
2002 Astronomical Almanac |
25770.036 |
| 2002.5 |
50.29164 |
2003 Astronomical Almanac |
25769.69 |
|
Using Newcomb’s Formula: 50.2564
+ .000222 (year – 1900):
Backward
in Time
| Year/Epoch |
Value ("/year) |
Period of Revolution |
150 B.C.
|
49.8013 (-.4551) |
26023 |
(-10,000 years)
|
48.0364 (-2.22) |
26980 |
(-50,000 years)
|
39.1564 (-11.1) |
33098 |
| (-100,000 years) |
28.0564 (-22.2) |
46193 |
|
Using Newcomb’s Formula: 50.2564 + .000222 (year – 1900):
Forward in Time
| Year/Epoch |
Value ("/year) |
Period of Revolution |
(+10,000 years)
|
52.4764 (+2.22) |
24697 |
(+20,000 years)
|
54.6964 (+4.44) |
23694 |
(+100,000 years)
|
72.4564 (+22.2) |
17887 |
| (+ 1 million) |
272.2564 (+222) |
4760 |
|
In this chart we have included precession calculations for 10 year
periods, over the last 100 years.
As the annual rate of precession accelerates, the orbit period (or
wobble cycle in lunisolor theory) will decrease.
The ascending line is the plot one would expect to see if our sun
were in a binary orbit with a total period of 24,000 years. Notice
the historical data has a high correlation to our hypothesized orbit
period.
Lunisolor theory gives no logical reason for the trend. A binary orbit,
conforming to the laws of elliptical orbits, is a logical explanation.
|
|
|
